Whenever a novice investor
suffers financial losses in markets pat comes the advice from relatively seasoned
players “Consider it as tution fees for
your learning”. After having paid (and continuing to pay) enormous amounts
of such tution fees on numerous occasions we are beginning an attempt at collating
some learnings through posts thus appropriately labeled “Fool’s Wisdom”.
Over time we hope to share our philosophy and general thoughts on investing through this series.
Over time we hope to share our philosophy and general thoughts on investing through this series.
We hasten to add that this mere
act of posting should not mean that we have discovered some holy grail of investing
and are now any less novice in our actions. Also, these are and should be
merely construed as OUR colour blind view of the ‘right’ way.
Like clothes, you are the best judge of whether our brand of investing may be
the right fit for your temperament. Infact, as time passes, our own bodies may change
shape and thus clothes that used to fit perfectly well earlier, might not fit
anymore and need to be discarded. Our thoughts are similarly liable to be
discarded to make way for fresh (or old) approaches which we ourselves find
more suitable.High conviction is not amongst our strengths and we think we are better off without it (as of now J).
To quote Parcher, the imaginary boss of Dr. Nash from the movie ‘A Beautiful Mind’-
“Conviction, it turns out, is the
luxury of those on the sidelines”.
It’s not only ‘WHAT’
but also ‘How Much’
Let us start with a story...
Without fail four friends, let us
call them Niren, Abhinav, X & Y, make it a point to meet annually every new
year day for a ‘stock idea forum’. The goal of this meeting is unambiguous. Hoping
to learn from ‘the wisdom of the crowd’, they aim to discuss threadbare and
identify 2-3 ideas which they could each add to their individual portfolios
with a 3-5 years investment horizon.
In January 2010, for reasons best
known to them, this group narrowed down on two ideas viz ITC and Suzlon. They
all decided to add these stocks to their respective portfolios. Three years later when they met
again in January 2013, other than the customary discussion on fresh ideas, they
also got down to reflecting on the performance of their individual portfolios. Soon,
it became evident that each had a different perspective. X was thrilled with
the positive contribution these meetings had made to his overall wealth. On the
contrary, Y seemed distraught. He seemed to think that the picks made by the
group had been nothing short of disastrous and he was seriously reconsidering
if he wanted to come back next year. Niren and Abhinav were largely indifferent.
This was a big surprise!! Had not
these friends had the same stocks in their portfolios ?? How come then each had a different
view on the returns of the stock picks??
The answer thankfully was not too
difficult to find. We share below the secret they unraveled J
Friend
|
Portfolio allocation to idea
|
Portfolio Impact
|
X
|
10% ITC, 1% Suzlon
|
+ 11.5%
|
Y
|
1% ITC, 10% Suzlon
|
-6.8%
|
Abhinav
|
1% ITC, 1% Suzlon
|
+ 0.4%
|
Niren
|
5% ITC, 5% Suzlon
|
+ 2.1%
|
ITC went up
122% in the 3 years while Suzlon fell 80%
It now dawned upon them!! All
these years while they had been vigorously debating stock ideas, they had
conveniently forgotten to close the discussion with the most important follow
up question. What should be the allocation!! While they were mature enough to acknowledge
that both, positive outcomes like ITC and accidents like Suzlon are inevitable
in the life and times of any investor, they realized that the position sizing
decision can make a good decision look bad and vice versa.
In fact sizing of the position probably has a larger role in overall wealth
creation as compared to the idea itself.
The discussions inevitably led to
the sharing of past experiences (The I had told you so syndrome). Niren remembered how he had identified Zydus
Wellness early but allocated only 1% to it thereby barely moving the needle,
while Abhinav had been none the wiser after his large allocation experience in
SKS Micro. While Y was understandably silent J, X pointed out the
fact that while there is a plethora of advice coming daily on how to go about
the what to buy or avoid decision, there seemed insufficient debate on how to
go about the all important position sizing decision.
They solemnly promised never to
break up without debating ‘HOW MUCH’. Without this it was all really a colossal
waste of time!!
We will follow up soon with OUR thoughts on "How Much".
Till then ..Best of Manufactured Luck !!
Till then ..Best of Manufactured Luck !!
Manufactured luck capital allocation is indeed most important part in the game. There is no scientific basis for the same (some research points that portfolio of 100 stocks across various industry is best suited for diversification) while some famous investor like to be best 5-6 stocks with different allocation based on own conviction level. Also in many thoughts it is proposed that for creating good wealth we have to take less number of bet when odds are in our favor and give big bets. Intuitively for Indian market considering RJ investments small to mid cap stocks with upto 20-25 number is best suited for the purpose (considering chances of more black swan even due to weak implementation of rules and regulations and deterrent for promoters against frauds). Ultimately it boils down to own objective and capital available at hand and how high probability he feels for success.
ReplyDeleteThanks Niraj for sharing your thoughts. We agree entirely that there is no 'scientific' basis for the allocation decision. But that is true for the stock selection decision as well. What is a good idea for one, may not be for the other and various styles exist. We hope to share our thoughts on an allocation framework in future posts..
Delete